Five Before Chaos

By way of Unreasonable Faith, they’ve apparently found the bones of St. Paul, the founder of Catholicism. The reasoning behind this earth-shattering, skull-bursting discovery?

So they tested some bones, and determined they belonged to someone who lived between 1 AD and 200 AD.

Therefore, it must be the Apostle St. Paul?

Sure, it could be. Or it could be anyone’s bones from that time period.

Same thing I was thinking, as it is obvious that his bones would be the only ones that could possibly survive. As I see it, there are no other human remains from the first century, C.E. There’s just no way there could be.

Bookmark to:

Hide Sites

Tags: Catholics

And apparently, even God himself realizes Joe the Plumber is an idiot, as Ron Moore’s new article about a WorldNut Daily interview with JTP reveals to us:

Asked if he has plans to run for public office, he replied, “I hope not. You know, I talked to God about that and he was like, ‘No.’”

And who knew that the Sky Fairy talked like Donna from, like, Beverly Hills, 90210?
Apparently, when not out shilling for the corporate plutocracy that’s perpetually screwing his demographic and railing against legislation he knows nothing about, he still has time to make proclamations about how Obama’s a bigger threat to the nation than the 9-11 attacks were (which in actuality, weren’t a “threat” to the perseverance of the nation, just its civil liberties and tolerance).

Palin-Wurzelbacher ‘12! Please, please, please?! I can’t think of a better source for perpetual content.

Bookmark to:

Hide Sites

Tags: idiots and assholes, Joe the Plumber

One for David:

Bookmark to:

Hide Sites

Tags: David Carradine

Regular readers here are probably aware of the Creation Museum in Kentucky, started by nutball Ken Ham of “Answers in Genesis” fame. Basically, it loks like a typical science museum… until you nitice that there’s exhibits featureing humans riding dinosaurs and such. Its role is to basically promote young-earth creationism, a Biblical literalist approach to the origins of the world, namely that it happened about 5-10 thousand years ago. Yeah, really stupid, I know.

Anyways, i found two articles about a group of scientists who actually went to visit… and were stunned at the depth and breadth of stupidity on display:

“I think they should rename the museum — not the Creation Museum, but the Confusion Museum,” said Lisa E. Park, a professor of paleontology at the University of Akron.

“Unfortunately, they do it knowingly,” Dr. Park said. “I was dismayed. As a Christian, I was dismayed.”

Dr. Bengtson noted that to explain how the few species aboard the ark could have diversified to the multitude of animals alive today in only a few thousand years, the museum said simply, “God provided organisms with special tools to change rapidly.”

“Thus in one sentence they admit that evolution is real,” Dr. Bengtson said, “and that they have to invoke magic to explain how it works.”

Another article (with some fantastic comments) also captures the scientists sentiments perfectly:

“It’s sort of a monument to scientific illiteracy, isn’t it?” said Jerry Lipps, professor of geology, paleontology and evolution at University of California, Berkeley.

“Like Sunday school with statues… this is a special brand of religion here. I don’t think even most mainstream Christians would believe in this interpretation of Earth’s history.”

Although “mainstream Christians” still believe some pretty nutty things, they don’t rise to the level of the insanity Ham is propagating.

Bookmark to:

Hide Sites

Tags: creationist museums

Chris at Open Left has a good one today, achingly obvious, yet still worth the read, So-called “Moderates” Have Become the Problem:

These so-called moderates are the real barrier to the progressive change that the country needs right now. As such, we should be directing our fire at them, rather that at the right-wing. Currently, the right-wing has no power whatsoever unless the moderates in Congress choose to side with them. And yet, it is the right-wing that progressive media keep aiming most of their attacks…

Wingnuttery is a tempting and easy target. Further, after eight eyars of the bush administration, attacking it has also grown into a real habit for progressives. However, after the electoral successes of 2008, the political reality has changed, and we need to change with it. Now, we have to direct our ire at the so-called moderates impeding real change, until such point as the congressional leadership and Obama administration have delivered more of what they promised during those long years when we all worked our asses off to get them elected.

He’s right; wingnuttery is a pathetically easy target – if it weren’t, this blog would’ve gone the way of OJ Simpson’s career a long time ago. It is so easy to mock them, due to the outlandish, ridiculous, reality-challenged, Rapture-ready outlook they have.  It’s not so easy to mock the moderate corporate sell-outs -what is going on is a bit more nuanced, and there’s no Joe the Plumber/Sarah Palin level of glaring mental deficiency to continually poke fun at and make silly photoshops of. It takes a more measured “this is how they’re fucking up progress” approach, which obviously requires a higher level of discourse (and persuasion).

It’s often easy to say that if you don’t stand for something, you stand for nothing, which is how I tend to characterize a lot of  so-called “moderate” positions. Real change comes from the die-hards, whether it be left or right, to use that tired dichotomy for a second. These moderates apparently do stand for something – the preservation of corporate power, nothing more, which is not change by any stretch of teh imagination.

We need more primary challenges. I was talking to Jack about this at the BBQ this weekend. As one who only nominally buys in to the “more, and better Dems” thing (in actuality, I just want more better people there in general, and believe that the Dem party structure is part of the problem, not the solution), I believe there needs to be some serious Stalinist purges challenges to the Dem status quo. We’ve seen glimmers of that with people like Donna Edwards and such, but it needs to go much, much further than it has. And no, I don’t put any hope or faith in the Dems, I’m just realistic that our options are truly limited at this particular point in time, with the way the system is currently structured.

Bookmark to:

Hide Sites

Tags: centrism, moderates, Open Left

One thing I don’ ttalk about much is my graphic arts doings. I’ve been using Photoshop, in prticular for a long time, and it started off just by making flyers for shows and events, but over the last few years, I’ve actually gotten some real paying work… ads, brochures, a few websites here and there. Given I’m going to be a single-income household again come fall, I’ve been trying to find new sources of income. I’m hoping to start playing music out again, not necessarily at the frantic level I did a few years back in the early 00’s, and I’ve also decided to start putting my graphic arts skills out there a bit more. I designed my business card yesterday, so if you’re looking for some ads, flyers, whatever, at reasonable rates, get in touch with me.

Bookmark to:

Hide Sites

Tags: Witherwillow Designs

So, Obama’s been a mixed bag so far for me. I never had high expectations to begin with, so there’s not some huge disappointment like there seems to be from those who bought into all the “hope and change” nonsense. He’s handled some things extraordinarily well, and others (namely war and secrecy) not much better that his braindead predecessor. Now, of course, it may just all be talk, as many of these things seem to pan out to be, but I was pleased about his statement about insurance companies yesterday:

“Why would it drive private insurance out of business?” he said of the proposed public option. If private insurers “tell us that they’re offering a good deal, then why is it that the government, which they say can’t run anything, suddenly is going to drive them out of business? That’s not logical.”

I will say this. The guy does have a knack sometimes for saying what needs to be said. It’d just be nice if he would do better on the actual follow-through. A big vat of vomit mixed with dead squirrels and rat feces is more popular than the GOP right now; fuck them – give them nothing. If we’re not going to have a public option in healthcare reform, and I mean a real one with teeth, don’t even bother. One “conventional wisdom” that needs to be attacked is this notion that somehow private industry has exclusive rights to providing healthcare. They don’t. Period.

Economic and political reality dictates we can’t just do away with the private insurers overnight – it’s huge. If you believe that we can, you’re an idiot. But a strong public option is like a cannon blast to that ship. And that brings me to a great commentary today from the Rude Pundit about patience:

Or, in even other words, it’s gonna take a fuck of a lot of work to get us back to zero, to the way things were before George W. Bush came in and pissed on our beds, raped our dogs, tied us up, set the house on fire, and left without calling 911. And then, once it’s back to zero, we can talk about how it gets better. Doesn’t make any of us less impatient and it doesn’t excuse some of the shit Obama’s doing (like continuing to argue the Bush administration side on cases left over from it), but we gotta recognize that the circumstances are: “We’re fucked – can we be un-fucked?”

So at his news conference today, we got the Obama we elected, the cool, can’t-be-fucked-with man who has answers up his sleeve that will make you wonder how the fuck he did that. To listen to his takedown of whiny ass insurance companies is to think that the man really does want to trick Americans into universal health care. And his exchange with Major Garrett of Fox “news” was a model for anyone going on that network: reject the premise and tell them how and where they can go fuck themselves.

Stuff’s not going to change overnight, and yes, they’re only going to change so much given the political realities of both Washington and the citizenry itself. It’s no excuse for complacency, and the many Obamamatons out there need their asses handed to them as much as the wingers do. But things are a bit less worse than they are five months ago.

Bookmark to:

Hide Sites

I’ve always been a fan of Richard Nixon. Not the politics of the man, of course, but more as a character study of a complex, and fatally flawed, insecure man. I even slogged through Oliver Stone’s almost 4-hour biopic a few months ago.  And Joe McGuiness’ The Selling of the President is a must-read, as it really is a document of the first modern divide-deceive-and-conquer presidential campaign that has more or less been the model ever since 1968.

So of course, whenever a new batch of Nixon tapes is released, it’s always a lot of fun. I remember when a batch in 2002 came out, and gave us a new insight about “America’s Preacher”, Billy Graham:

But this conversation with Billy Graham is something else again. Here is the most admired and influential religious leader in America complaining to the president of the United States about the Jews and their “stranglehold” on the media, and blaming them for “all the pornography.”

Even when Nixon replies that he agrees but “can’t say that” in public, Graham presses the point: Yes, right, but if you get elected to a second term, then we could do something about the problem.

Graham adds that while many Jews are friendly to him, “they don’t know how I really feel about what they are doing to this country.”

And the latest batch to be released yesterday doesn’t fail to disappoint, either. Apparently, Nixon, reacting to the Roe v. Wade ruling, was rather ambivalent about abortion. But he did find it a necessity in some cases:

“There are times when an abortion is necessary. I know that. When you have a black and a white,” he told an aide, before adding, “Or a rape.”

Class act, that Nixon fella.

Bookmark to:

Hide Sites

Tags: Richard Nixon

(crossposted on Green Mountain Daily)

and that would be… Glenn Beck. Yeah, that Glenn Beck, he of the hysterics, teabagging, hatemongering, and America’s most high-profile purveyor of right-wing bullshit conspiracy theories. And of course, you know the other guy, Thomas “Obviously a Good Confederate” Naylor, of the punchline known as Second Vermont Republic, the Vermont secessionist group that GMD brought to your attention two years ago of having lots of friends in the Neo-Confederate movement.

So, anyways, fact-checking (oh, who am I kidding, reality) has never been one of Beck’s strong suits, so of course he has Naylor on his show for an interview. Given that Naylor’s completely lost the support of the left in Vermont due to his love of the Stars n’ Bars and all it stands for, he must figure, what the hell, why not shoot for the paranoid right? Beck heaps tons of praise on him, of course, and unquestionably accepts Naylor’s ridiculous claim that a whopping 60,000 registered Vermont voters support secession (yet SVR, oddly enough, has about 1,000 supporters), and I’ve yet to meet anyone who takes Naylor seriously at this point. Well, I can think of one person… I’ll get to him in a minute.

You can read the very cordial interview between Beck and Naylor here. Naylor starts off by thanking Beck for “stirring the pot” (would that be those rabidly succesful tea parties, perhaps?) , and then imparts such wisdom as:

The movement rolls on, in spite of the fact that Vermont is probably the most left-wing state in the country and voted very strongly for Barack Obama. This poses a challenge for us. But people are beginning to see that, really, there’s not much difference between his policies and those of George W. Bush…. People were more angry at George W. Bush, but now, under Obama with the economic meltdown, there’s genuine fear.

Yes, Unreconstrcted Confederates such as Naylor have a lot to fear from Obama, at least in their warped world view. As for this “movement rolling on”, well, Dr. Naylor, that train left the station two years ago.

Beck, like Naylor’s organization, also has the attention of the Southern Poverty Law Center, the exemplary hate-watch group which released a report last year on SVR, with this beautiful quote from Naylor himself that really shows the essence of what the man is all about:

In the face of these criticisms, Naylor remains defiant. “I don’t give a shit what you write,” he told the Report. “If someone tells me that I shouldn’t associate with the League of the South, it guarantees that I will associate with the League of the South.”

Beck is on record as saying how the far-right, racist John Birchers are “starting to make more and more sense to him.”

Tommy Reb doesn’t have too many friends left in these parts, but he can always count on Rob “Is he a racist? I dont know. And frankly, it is none of my damn business, at a personal level,” Williams of Vermont Commons, whose integrity lies flapping in the wind like a noose from a magnolia tree, posts the Beck video with with this brief, insightful commentary:

And Mr. Beck seems surprisingly lucid and thoughtful this evening

Indeed. These people never seem to learn, PhD’s notwithstanding.

Bookmark to:

Hide Sites

Tags: Glenn Beck, idiots and assholes, thomas naylor

Those of you who spend a lot of passive recreation time in the forest  (skiing, hiking, biking) probably think ATV”s are a big pain in the ass. There’s nothing better than enjoying a quiet sunny day out in the woods, only to have a family of fatasses suddenly appear out of nowhere tearin’ up the trail (and yes, I know damn well that’s not all of them, but I do seem to see quite a lot in that mold in my area of the woods). For those who profess it to be a “sport”, I can’t think of any other sports where one can be obese and an athlete at the same time. And let me be clear, ATV’s do have a purpose, pulling out big game, firewood, etc. I don’t really have a problem with that. I do have a problem with the recreational aspect on state lands. It’s the one place we can go to get away from this kind of shit. There are respectful drivers, I know, but there’s also plenty of private land they can go tear up, if they’d like.

So anyways, they’ve extended the public comment period, and if you think similarly, then you need to let them know. I’m gonna just steal from Mike at Broadsides, who’s been on top of this issue:

About that ATV thing: The Vermont Agency of Natural Resources has extended its deadline for public comments on its new proposed rule to allow ATVs on state land. You now have until July 6th to let them know that it is an absurd idea. You know, almost as absurd as firing up a chainsaw in a public building.

Comments should be directed to: Warren Coleman, ANR, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, VT 05671. Email your comments to: ATVRULE@state.vt.us.

A simple message (“do not open up state land to ATVs”) is all it takes. Do. It. Now. And, better yet, make your friends and family members do it too.

Bookmark to:

Hide Sites

Tags: ATV's