Science and the Art of Language


When discussing the ‘intelligent design’ debate, one idea I’ve beaten to death is that scientists have a looooooooooooooooooong way to go in explaining and clarifying science and its methods to the layman. It would go a long way to diffusing the mistrusted ‘ivory tower’ elitist image that so many people have regarding scientists. For a great example of how this should be done, read Dr. Penny Higgins’ article “Why Intelligent Design is not Science and therefore, Should Not Be Taught in a Science Curriculum”

Clear, plain language. No condescending tone, a la Dawkins. But most importantly, not ‘dumbed down’ either. Give it a read.

This entry was posted on Saturday, March 4th, 2006 at 10:15 amand is filed under intelligent design. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

One Response to “Science and the Art of Language”

  • Disclaimer and Copyright Stuff

    By commenting here, you grant FBC permission to quote or republish this comment without restriction, notification, or compensation. Also, you acknowledge that you alone are fully responsible for (and bear full legal liability for) the content of this comment, including inaccuracies or potentially libelous statements. You certify that in this comment you have disclosed no proprietary or confidential information. This agreement applies even if you choose to post anonymously or supply false or incomplete identification. FBC is not responsible for your stupidity, so all you right-wingers who love to go on about "personal responsibility" please take note. If you troll, it's coming down. Tough shit, it's my house. "Five Before Chaos", as well as the "chaos clock" logo are copyrighted, and may not be used without express permission of this blog's owner.