Oct 29 2008
More on that McCain media whine
As I’ve mentioned recently, there’s been some whining about the media favoring Obama over McCain, and indeed, the Obama coverage is more positive. But it’s because the two different campaigns are like night and day… one is extremely well-organized, focused, and ideally, appealing to peoples’ better nature. The other is floundering, ever-shifting, increasingly negative, pathetic and desperate, and is appealing to the xenophobic, anti-intellectual anti-progress crowd. How is that positive?
Anyways, have a look at John F. Harris & Jim Vandehei’s Why McCain is Getting Hosed in the Press over at Politico today:
There have been moments in the general election when the one-sidedness of our site — when nearly every story was some variation on how poorly McCain was doing or how well Barack Obama was faring — has made us cringe.
As it happens, McCain’s campaign is going quite poorly and Obama’s is going well. Imposing artificial balance on this reality would be a bias of its own.
He’s running a shitty campaign and he and Bible Spice like to lie. A lot. They say things that assume their audience is stupid and reactionary, which seems to prove itself true, time and time again. That’s not saying Obama has been straight up about everything (he most certainly hasn’t), but there’s no way to put a shine on the sheer amount of bullshit and bad judgement coming out of the McCain campaign, and it’s a stark contrast to the Obama campaign. I have a lot of reservations about Obama, but since I’ve been following politics closely over the last 15 years, I’ve never seen a campaign run this well on many levels. It’s astounding, actually. There’s the occasional hiccup, but afterwards, he seems to come out of it even stronger than before.






Posts


